The Commission Habit: Ramaphosa’s Fifth Inquiry Into Police Corruption Sparks Criticism

Johannesburg, South Africa – President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced the launch of another judicial commission of inquiry into police corruption—his fifth commission since taking office. While framed as a step toward accountability, critics argue the pattern reflects “chronic leadership paralysis.”

The Cost of Endless Inquiries

Data from previous commissions paints a worrying picture:

• Average duration: 14 months per inquiry
• Collective cost: Over R1.2 billion to taxpayers
• Impact: Fewer than five high-profile convictions

Analysts warn that the commission model delays action, erodes public trust, and allows systemic corruption to persist unchecked.

READ: Political Killings Task Team Collapsed Due to Resource Gaps, Says Masemola

Alternatives to the ‘Commission Culture’

Prominent activist Dr. Allan Boesak compared South Africa’s approach to international standards:

“In functional democracies, ministers facing such serious allegations would be immediately suspended pending criminal investigation, not granted paid leave behind a wall of judicial processes.”

Critics argue that while commissions uncover valuable evidence, they are increasingly being used as political shields rather than decisive governance tools.

READ: General Mkhwanazi Accuses Police Minister Senzo Mchunu of Political Interference

Why It Matters

With police corruption undermining crime prevention, public safety, and investor confidence, the stakes are high. Observers fear that another drawn-out inquiry will stall reforms, leaving accountability deferred once again.

South Africa faces a choice: continue down the costly commission route or adopt direct disciplinary and prosecutorial measures to restore credibility in law enforcement.