NewsInSA

The Mkhwanazi Dossier: Key Allegations Requiring Parliamentary Action

Published: Jul 17, 2025 · 2 min read

Share Post

Author: NewsInSA

Article image

From 'comrade' Moti to missing dockets - the claims demanding scrutiny

Smoking Guns: Parliament Pressed to Act on Explosive Allegations Against Police Leadership

Cape Town, South Africa – South Africa’s joint Police and Justice parliamentary committees face mounting pressure to confront a series of explosive allegations that go to the heart of political interference and institutional sabotage within law enforcement.

READ: Madlanga Commission: Day Three Reveals Alleged Political Interference and SAPS Links to Drug Cartels

Core Allegations on the Table

The committees are expected to grapple with three key claims:

  • Minister’s Denial: Water and Sanitation Minister Senzo Mchunu initially denied knowing “Mr. Brown Moti”, but later referred to him as a “comrade.”
  • Task Team Interference: At least 121 political killing dockets were allegedly diverted away from specialist investigators.
  • Institutional Sabotage: Critical Crime Intelligence posts have been left vacant for years, weakening the state’s ability to respond to organized crime.

These revelations have further eroded public trust in the South African Police Service (SAPS), already at historic lows.

Commission Conundrum

The launch of Justice Madlanga’s judicial inquiry presents Parliament with a dilemma:

  • At least five “ready-to-arrest” cases risk being delayed by commission timelines.
  • Key evidence may never surface if it remains locked in judicial proceedings.
  • Whistleblowers within SAPS urgently need protection before their testimony is silenced.

Critics argue commissions often act as political cover, rather than delivering swift accountability.

Ethics Committee Pathway

Legal advisors have reminded MPs that Parliament has independent mechanisms at its disposal. In particular, the Ethics Committee could immediately examine questions of ministerial truthfulness and accountability—without waiting years for judicial findings.

This route, advocates say, could restore some degree of public faith in Parliament’s oversight role, while the judicial process runs its course.

READ: Fannie Masemola to Testify at Madlanga Commission as SAPS Corruption Claims Deepen

Why It Matters

With police credibility collapsing, and allegations of interference in murder investigations, the stakes for South Africa’s democracy are stark. The choice before lawmakers:

  • Delay justice behind another drawn-out commission, or
  • Act decisively through parliamentary ethics and oversight.

The outcome will determine whether Parliament is seen as a guardian of accountability—or a shield for the powerful.

Related Articles

Browse More Categories